Document:Drug Consumption contents
From AIDS Wiki
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER NOTICE ON THIS PAGE, the material on this page is NOT available under the GNU Free Documentation License; in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, it is posted in the manner of bulletin boards in schools and workplaces, to encourage public education and citizen awareness, without profit or payment, for persons and entities engaging in non-profit research and educational activities and purposes only.
AIDS Acquired by Drug Consumption and Other Noncontagious Risk Factors
Pharmacology & Therapeutics 55: 201–277, 1992
Table of Contents
[edit]
Contents
- Abstract
- 1. Virus-AIDS Hypothesis Fails to Predict Epidemiology and Pathology of AIDS
- 2. Definition of AIDS
- 3. Discrepancies Between AIDS and Infectious Disease
- 3.1. Criteria of Infectious and Noninfectious Disease
- 3.2. AIDS Not Compatible with Infectious Disease
- 3.4. Noncorrelations Between HIV and AIDS
- 3.4.1. Only about Half of American AIDS is Confirmed HIV-antibody-positive
- 3.4.2. Antibody-positive, but Virus-negative AIDS
- 3.4.3. HIV: Just One of Many Harmless Microbial Markers of Behavioral and Clinical AIDS Risks
- 3.4.4. Annual AIDS Risks of Different HIV-infected Risk Groups, Including Babies, Homosexuals, Drug Addicts, Hemophiliacs and Africans, Differ over 100-fold
- 3.4.4.1. Critically Ill Recipients of Transfusion
- 3.4.4.2. HIV-infected Babies
- 3.4.4.3. HIV-positive Homosexuals
- 3.4.4.4. HIV-positive Intravenous Drug Users
- 3.4.4.5. HIV-positive Hemophiliacs
- 3.4.4.6. HIV-positive Teenagers
- 3.4.4.7. HIV-positive General U.S. Population
- 3.4.4.8. HIV-positive Africans
- 3.4.4.9. HIV-positive Thais
- 3.4.5. Specific AIDS Diseases Predetermined by Prior Health Risks
- 3.5. Assumptions and Anecdotal Cases that Appear to Support the Virus-AIDS Hypothesis
- 3.5.1. HIV is Presumed New Because AIDS is New
- 3.5.2. HIV – Assumed to be Sexually Transmitted – Depends on Perinatal Transmission for Survival
- 3.5.3. AIDS Assumed to be Proportional to HIV Infection
- 3.5.4. AIDS Assumed to be Homosexually Transmitted in the U.S. and Europe
- 3.5.5. AIDS Assumed to be Heterosexually Transmitted by African “Life-style”
- 3.5.6. HIV Claimed to be Abundant in AIDS Cases
- 3.5.7. HIV to Depend on Cofactors for AIDS
- 3.5.8. All AIDS Diseases to Result from Immunodeficiency
- 3.5.9. HIV to Induce AIDS via Autoimmunity and Apoptosis
- 3.5.10. HIV Assumed to Kill T-cells
- 3.5.11. Antibodies Assumed not to Neutralize HIV
- 3.5.12. HIV Claimed to Cause AIDS in 50% Within 10 Years
- 3.5.13. HIV Said to Derive Pathogenicity from Constant Mutation
- 3.5.14. HIV Assumed to Cause AIDS with Genes Unique Among Retroviruses
- 3.5.15. Simian Retroviruses to Prove that HIV Causes AIDS
- 3.5.16. Anecdotal AIDS Cases from the General Population
- 3.6. Consequences of the Virus-AIDS Hypothesis
- 4. The Drug-AIDS Hypothesis
- 4.1. Chronological Coincidence Between the Drug and AIDS Epidemics
- 4.2. Overlap Between Drug-Use and AIDS Statistics
- 4.3. Drug Use in AIDS Risk Groups
- 4.4. Drug Use Necessary for AIDS in HIV-Positives
- 4.5. Drug Use Sufficient for AIDS Indicator Diseases in the Absence of HIV
- 4.6. Toxic Effects of Drugs Used By AIDS Patients
- 4.7. Drug-AIDS Hypothesis Correctly Predicts the Epidemiology and Heterogeneous Pathology of AIDS
- 4.8. Consequences of the Drug-AIDS Hypothesis: Risk-Specific Preventions and Therapies, but Resentment by the Virus-AIDS Establishment
- 5. Drugs and Other Noncontagious Risk Factors Resolve all Paradoxes of the Virus-AIDS Hypothesis
- 6. Why Did AIDS Science Go Wrong?
[edit]
Tables and Figures
- Table 1. AIDS Statistics
- Table 2. Annual AIDS Risks of HIV-infected Groups
- Table 3. Immunosuppression in HIV-negative and -positive Hemophiliacs
- Figure 1. Determination of the Age of a Microbe in a Population Based on Farr’s Law
[edit]


